China Post Forum

Welcome Guest 

Show/Hide Header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: LT653437103CN
bean7
Newbie
Posts: 23
Post Re: LT653437103CN
on: January 20, 2017, 15:17
New Topic

ok, now I received a package sent by standard airmail, delivery date was Feb 14 - March 28. I ordered it on the 6th of January, how was this package which was free shipping, able to get here way before my epacket, which is still in transit since January2, and costed me 17 dollars for shipping? Seller keeps saying be patient, there's a back up of mail in warehouse. Isn't epacket suppose to be faster than standard?
bean7
Newbie
Posts: 23
Post Re: LT653437103CN
on: January 20, 2017, 17:50
New Topic

yesterday I received a package that ordered on the 6th of January, standard mail free shipping, I still haven't received my epacket that's been in transit since January 2nd. I paid 17 dollars for shipping, isn't epackets suppose to be quicker?
int077
Pro
Posts: 7760
Post Re: LT653437103CN
on: January 20, 2017, 19:53
New Topic

Quote from bean7 on January 20, 2017, 15:17
ok, now I received a package sent by standard airmail, delivery date was Feb 14 - March 28. I ordered it on the 6th of January, how was this package which was free shipping, able to get here way before my epacket, which is still in transit since January2, and costed me 17 dollars for shipping? Seller keeps saying be patient, there's a back up of mail in warehouse. Isn't epacket suppose to be faster than standard?

1. Your parcel Free delivery, it's not a Register parcel so lest work/handling to be done to that parcel then to the E Packet which has to be track and confirm delivery.

Thanks.
Pages: 1 [2]


Share the post "China Post Forum"