China Post Forum

Welcome Guest 

Show/Hide Header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ORDER NOT RECEIVED RH324073178CN
jmcknight1-
23
Newbie
Posts: 3
Post ORDER NOT RECEIVED RH324073178CN
on: July 28, 2016, 15:19
New Topic

I have not received my package. It was supposed to be shipped to Canada. Can you please tell me where my package is. The shipper said they did not get it back but the status shows delivered.

DrewG
Newbie
Posts: 6
Post Re: ORDER NOT RECEIVED RH324073178CN
on: July 28, 2016, 15:29
New Topic

Looks like this package was returned to China and delivered back to the seller.

Parcel No.RH324073178CN tracking result
2016-05-27 18:29:27.0 Guangzhou Int'l Parcel Center received
2016-05-27 18:29:32.0 Guangzhou Int'l Parcel Center customs scan
2016-05-27 23:11:12.0 leaving Guangzhou Int'l Parcel Center ，next station 广商大宗
2016-05-28 19:58:27.0 Shanghai Transit Station export security scan
2016-05-29 01:48:53.0 Shanghai Transit Station export customs cleared
2016-06-08 14:19:00.0 arrive Shanghai Int'l Airport
2016-06-08 17:41:53.0 leaving Shanghai Int'l Airport going to next airport/seaport
2016-07-02 09:02:51.0 Beijing Transit Station import customs scan
2016-07-02 13:55:16.0 Beijing Transit Station import customs cleared (domestic transit )
2016-07-05 07:16:50.0 Shanghai Transit Station import customs scan
2016-07-05 10:06:30.0 Shanghai Transit Station import customs cleared (domestic transit )
2016-07-06 10:12:58.0 arrive 梅陇dept. delivery office
2016-07-06 14:44:23.0 梅陇dept. attempt delivery
2016-07-06 14:45:00.0 梅陇dept. delivered [u][/u]
jmcknight1-
23
Newbie
Posts: 3
Post Re: ORDER NOT RECEIVED RH324073178CN
on: July 29, 2016, 14:21
New Topic

The seller is claiming that they didn't get it back. What do I do?

int077
Pro
Posts: 7760
Post Re: ORDER NOT RECEIVED RH324073178CN
on: July 29, 2016, 14:54
New Topic

1. I already answer (int077) that question in the other topic you open with the same title. Just go and see it.

Hope this help
Pages: [1]


Share the post "China Post Forum"